Group preference structures in AHP–group decision making
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper presents a procedure that allows us to determine the preference structures (PS) associated to each of the different groups of actors that can be identified in a group decision making problem with a large number of individuals. To that end, it makes use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Saaty, 1980) as the technique to solve discrete multicriteria decision making problems. This technique permits the resolution of multicriteria, multienvironment and multiactor problems in which subjective aspects and uncertainty have been incorporated into the model, constructing ratio scales corresponding to the priorities relative to the elements being compared, normalised in a distributive manner (wi = 1). On the basis of the individuals’ priorities we identify different clusters for the decision makers and, for each of these, the associated preference structure using, to that end, tools analogous to those of Multidimensional Scaling. The resulting PS will be employed to extract knowledge for the subsequent negotiation processes and, should it be necessary, to determine the relative importance of the alternatives being compared using anyone of the existing procedures.
منابع مشابه
The Role of the DS/AHP in Identifying Inter-Group Alliances and Majority Rule Within Group Decision Making
DS/AHP is a nascent method of multi-criteria decision-making, based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and indirectly the Analytic Hierarchy Process. It is concerned with the identification of the levels of preference that decision makers have towards certain decision alternatives (DAs), through preference judgements made over a number of different criteria. The working result from a DS/...
متن کاملA Clustering Algorithm in Group Decision Making
The homogeneous requirement of the AHP has stifled its general application and thus hindered the further development of group decision making, which is becoming increasingly popular with the multi-business corporations. In this paper, we adopted the correlation degree of individual preference vectors as the measurement of individuals similarity based on AHP vector space VAHP proposed by Zahir i...
متن کاملApplication of PROMETHEE method for green supplier selection: a comparative result based on preference functions
The PROMETHEE is a significant method for evaluating alternatives with respect to criteria in multi-criteria decision-making problems. It is characterized by many types of preference functions that are used for assigning the differences between alternatives in judgements. This paper proposes a preference of green suppliers using the PROMETHEE under the usual criterion preference functions. Comp...
متن کاملUsing Ds/ahp to Rank of Sectors on Their Potential to Strengthen Regional Economic Development
DS/AHP is a nascent method for multi-criteria decision making (MCDM), applied here to the ranking of sectors (industries). Moreover, the preference of each sector over different criteria is dependent on their expected ability to improve the development prospects of a UK region. Due to the large number of sectors considered in this case, the use of more traditional MCDM techniques such as AHP is...
متن کاملGroup Generalized Interval-valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Sets and Their Applications in\ Decision Making
Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs) are widely used to handle uncertainty and imprecision in decision making. However, in more complicated environment, it is difficult to express the uncertain information by an IVIFS with considering the decision-making preference. Hence, this paper proposes a group generalized interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft set (G-GIVIFSS) which conta...
متن کامل